Nitrogen-fixing Covercrops for California Rice
Production (3/4)
G.S. Pettygrove and J.F. Williams
CASE
STUDIES IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY
Case
1. Sutter County -- Sills Farms Experiment
In a five-year field experiment on a loam soil in Sutter Co.,
researchers measured the above-ground N content of purple vetch shortly
before incorporation in late April each year. Covercrop growth varied from
year to year with amount of rain and success in stand establishment. In
one year (1993), extremely wet, saturated soil conditions in the late winter
and early spring almost completely suppressed covercrop growth, even though
an adequate stand had been established. In the other years, N content of
the above-ground biomass ranged from 34 to 105 lb N/acre. Including all
five years, N content averaged 49 lb N/acre in fall-burned plots and 39
lb N/acre in fall-disced plots (Table 2). In the final year of the experiment,
vetch plants exhibited P deficiency. Low soil pH (4.5 - 5.0) contributed
to that problem.
| Table 2. Purple vetch N content
and equivalent fertilizer N value in a continuous rice rotation. |
 |
| Straw
burned in fall |
Straw
disced in fall |
| Rice crop year |
Vetch N content |
N fertilizer replacement |
Vetch N content |
N fertilizer replacement |
 |
| lb N/acre |
| 1990 |
38 |
74 |
16 |
88 |
| 1991 |
105 |
108 |
86 |
90 |
| 1992 |
57 |
90 |
47 |
60 |
| 1993 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
| 1994 |
37 |
70 |
34 |
60 |
| 5-yr average |
49 |
68 |
39 |
60 |
 |
| Data from Sills Farm, Sutter Co. (Rice Research
Board annual reports, Project RM-6, 1990-94) |
Excluding 1993
data, the fertilizer N replacement value of vetch ranged from 60 to 108
lb N/acre with each pound of N in the vetch above-ground biomass tops replacing
1.4 to 1.5 lb of fertilizer N. Equivalency of vetch N to 100% or more of
fertilizer N has been reported by others in California (Case Study 2 and
Williams et al., 1968). However, lower fertilizer N equivalencies have
also been reported (Williams et al., 1972 described in Case Study 3 below).
Possibly in some cases, covercrop N is supplied to rice plants more efficiently
than synthetic fertilizer N applied shortly before flooding. The explanation
given by some researchers for this relatively greater efficacy of covercrop
N is that temporary immobilization of inorganic N during initial stages
of decomposition before flooding minimizes losses from denitrification
and volatilization (Huang and Broadbent, 1989).
Also, after
five years, the top foot of soil on covercropped plots contained about
seven percent more organic matter and total nitrogen than the non-covercropped
plots. This occurred even though in four of the five years, the non-covercropped
plots received nitrogen fertilizer and the covercropped plots did not.
Rice grain
yields at the Sills Farms experiment showed a strong nitrogen response.
On the straw-burned plots, there appeared to be a non-nitrogen effect.
Grain yields on the covercropped plots at the optimal fertilizer N rate
exceeded maximum yields on the non-covercropped plots (Figure 1). The yield
advantage was small but occurred in four of the five years.
 |
| Figure 1. Five-year average yields as influenced by
covercropping and rice straw management at the Sills Farms experiment in
Sutter County, 1990-94. Straw management and covercropping treatments were
repeated annually on the same 0.5 acre plots with six replicates. |
Straw
breakdown and microbial diversity. After five years, researchers
observed faster rice straw breakdown in plots that had a history of rice
straw incorporation compared to those where straw had been burned every
year (Figure 2). Results indicated that rice straw incorporation, and to
a lesser extent covercropping with vetch, enhanced the overall size and
diversity of soil microbes (Table 3; and Bossio and Scow, 1995). Although
the effects were small, some effect persisted year round and did change
straw decomposition rates in the field.
 |
| Figure 2. Effect of covercropping
and rice straw disposal method on disappearance of straw buried in nylon
mesh bags (Unpublished data, D. Bossio). Rice straw disposal methods and
covercropping had been in effect for five years before bags were buried. |
| Table 3. Effect of covercropping
with purple vetch and rice straw management method on soil microbial substrate-induced-respiration.
Covercropping and straw treatments had been in effect for five years before
measurement was made (Unpublished data, D. Bossio. For description of methods,
see Bossio and Scow, 1995). |
 |
| Straw/covercrop practice |
March 22 |
April 19 |
 |
| Straw burned |
mg CO2
g -1 soil hr-1 |
Vetch covercrop |
4.29 bc |
2.49 a |
No covercrop |
3.12 c |
2.81 a |
| Straw spring-incorporated |
Vetch covercrop |
6.66 a |
3.09 a |
No covercrop |
4.88 b |
3.11 a |
 |
| Values followed by the same letter in a column
are not significantly different at the 5% level of significance. |
Case 2. Butte County -- Skinner Ranch
A one-year on-farm experiment was conducted in 1989 in Butte
County on a clay soil. The field had been burned and disced. Covercrop
species were broadcast seeded in mid-October, 1988, on plots replicated
six times. Rates of seeding were: Bell bean - 150 lb/acre, purple vetch
- 40 lb/acre, Lana vetch - 30 lb/acre. Seed was covered by harrowing. Above-ground
covercrop biomass and N content were measured on subplots shortly before
incorporation by discing on May 3. Subplots within each covercrop plot
received rates of N as ammonium sulfate by drill. M-201 rice was planted
and grown with conventional practices, except that the grower withheld
N fertilizer on the experiment area.
Biomass yields
for the three species ranged from 2,046 to 2,685 lb/acre dry matter. Above-ground
N contents in lb N/acre (with standard deviations) were:
| Purple vetch |
70 ±20 |
| Lana vetch |
47 ±6 |
| Bell bean |
59 ±10 |
With no
covercrop, grain yields were maximized with 60 lb N/acre (Table 4). On
all covercropped plots, grain yield was maximized with no fertilizer N.
Thus, the three covercrop species provided N equivalent to about 60 lb
N/acre of fertilizer. As in the Sills Farm experiment (Case Study 1), fertilizer
replacement value of the covercrop was close to or above 100% of the aboveground
N content. For all treatments, rates of N fertilizer above the optimum
reduced yield due to lodging and possibly blanking. Maximum yields on covercropped
plots appeared to be 2 to 5 cwt/acre higher than the maximum yield on the
non-covercropped plots. Rice yields did not differ among the three covercrop
species.
| Table 4. Effect of covercropping
on rice grain N response in Butte Co., Skinner Ranch, 1989. |
 |
| N fertilizer rate |
No covercrop |
Purple vetch |
Lana vetch |
Bell bean |
 |
| lb N/acre |
grain yield, cwt/acre, 13% moisture |
| 0 |
67.6 |
82.8 |
80.2 |
83.3 |
| 30 |
73.2 |
78.1 |
76.7 |
79.7 |
| 60 |
78.2 |
67.2 |
73.5 |
77.6 |
| 90 |
70.4 |
63.1 |
52.7 |
59.2 |
 |
| Covercrop treatment means LSD .05 = 2.9 cwt/acre;
within N=0 treatment LSD .05 = 7.9 cwt. Maximum yields for each covercrop
treatment are highlighted. |
Case
3. Butte County -- Rice Experiment Station (Williams et. al, 1972)
A five-year field experiment was conducted at the Rice Experiment
Station in Biggs on a Stockton clay soil to compare straw incorporation
methods and to determine the effect of covercropping with purple vetch.
Subplots were fertilized annually with 0, 40, 80, and 120 lb N/acre as
ammonium sulfate drill applied. Five-year average grain yields showed no
measurable difference between rice straw burning and incorporation at any
level of fertilizer or vetch N. Vetch covercropping had a positive effect
on yield equivalent to about 40 lb N/acre (Table 5). The effect was similar
on straw-burned and straw-incorporated plots (not shown). The researchers
did not report purple vetch seeding rate, planting method, or vetch biomass
and N production. Generally, vetch grew poorly and supplied only about
25% of the N needs of the rice crop.
| Table 5. Effect of covercropping with purple vetch on rice grain
yield averaged over five years and across straw-burned and straw-incorporated
treatments. |
 |
| N applied to rice |
Purple vetch |
No covercrop |
 |
| lb/acre |
cwt/acre, 14% moisture |
| 0 |
43 |
27 |
| 40 |
51 |
41 |
| 80 |
56 |
52 |
| 120 |
54 |
57 |
 |
| Maximum yields for each treatment are highlighted. |
|